Pay less, keep more!

This is the basic premise of a short blog entry by FT’s John Gapper.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, which as the New York Times puts it, is “a notably gruelling place for a lawyer to work”, is offering all 1,300 of its associates – employees below partner level a year off, on a third of their salaries, as a means of cutting costs and sitting out the downturn.

I suppose this mostly applies to those who are particularly in a better situation than their peers, because after all, paying a third or whatever fraction still does cost something.  And when applied to a thousand or so employees is still worth quite a handful.  For some, letting go of redundancies are just plain inevitable.  But when companies have the options of paying a group of employees a fraction of their original compensation, instead of letting go of more, the first option is without a doubt much better.  Gapper ended the entry by saying,

It is very expensive to find well-trained employees who fit well into any business and are highly-productive. Having found them, even if there is insufficient work for them to do, it is probably cheaper to keep them on retainer than to discard them.

Which is true to a certain degree. But then again 1, it depends on the kind of jobs are being vacated and 2, a lot of the people let go now are perhaps just as qualified as the others.  The way I see it, what looks more appealing is to see less layoffs because it’s just brutal to see how bad things have become (and would become).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s